|
Victorian Military Society
About Us
VMS Contacts
VMS Contacts
VMS Fair
Join the VMS
Society Shop
Soldiers of the Queen
Current issue
Book Reviews
Contributors' Notes
Advertisement Rates
SOTQ archive
Buy back issues
Special Interest & Study Groups
Sudan group
Anglo-Boer Wars Group
Diehards
Anglo-Boer
War Memorials Project
Military History Articles
Archive
Links Page

Registered Charity No. 1117006
|
A "Toff's Life" in the blockhouse
by David Buttery
During the third stage of the war in South Africa more than eight thousand
blockhouses were built in an attempt to curtail the Boer guerrillas'
freedom of movement. Although occasionally placed to defend railways
or areas of strategic importance, their general purpose was to divide
the open countryside into sectors with fortified lines. These were often
crude structures consisting, in their most basic form, of a single storey
building with corrugated iron sheets filled with rubble, surrounded
by a stone or sand bag wall and placed upon an eminence. Blockhouses
were usually built within rifle range of each other and were supplemented
by barbed wire entanglements and other impediments between each structure.
It was Kitchener's hope that, during British attempts to track down
Boer forces, the Boers would increasingly find themselves with a choice
between turning and facing their pursuers or having to force their way
through these fortified lines. There is still considerable debate between
historians as to the effectiveness of this strategy. Certainly the blockhouse
lines were not impenetrable and the guerrilla leader De Wet referred
to the blockhouse system as the 'blockhead system'.
However, the system did slow the guerrillas down and certainly hindered
their operations.
Conditions inside the blockhouses must have been spartan and duties,
whilst manning the system, must have been tedious for the common soldier.
However, some press correspondents claimed that the troops often preferred
the inactivity of guarding blockhouses to the danger, stress and exhaustion
involved in tracking down the Boers.
Military life is often said to consist largely of boredom and routine
duties with occasional incidences of violent action, particularly in
the case of manning fortifications.
Private Ernest Griffin of the Third Leicestershires, found himself
stationed in a blockhouse towards the end of the war. Writing to his
half brother, Athur Moore, Griffin described his impressions of life
guarding the veldt. Arthur Moore had another brother in the Leicestershire
Regiment who had been besieged in Ladysmith, this letter being found
amongst their correspondence. Joseph Moore had written to Arthur describing
the squalor, starvation and sickness during the siege of 1899-1900
and Griffin's letter must have provided an interesting contrast.
At the time of writing Griffin had only recently arrived in Cape Colony
and the war was drawing to a close. Indeed the letter is dated the twenty
fifth of May 1902 and the war ended only six days afterwards. Griffin
described his post as being between Knapdaar and Burgherdorp in the
north west of Cape Colony. This location is, in fact, in the north east
of Cape Colony, south of Bloemfontein in the Orange Free State. Griffin
was probably unaware of how large this area and South Africa were and
his error is possibly due to the fact that he may have passed through
Queenstown on his journey, his post being northwest of that city.
In many accounts of military life tales of squalor, depviation and
back breaking work are commonplace but Griffin's letter conveys a refreshingly
different impression. The first few lines of his letter summarise his
initial attitude to life in the South African Field Force:
It is a toffs life in a blockhouse no work to do
but to sleep and eat. As for the eatables we get very good food, the
reation train comes every two days and drops at each blockhouse ¼
of a sheep, 6 loaves, 4 pounders and 1 pint of rum, then every 12 days
a supply train comes with sugar, coffee, tea, jam or marmalade, potatoes,
candles, pepper, salt, etc. and don't forget there is plenty of it...
Although this letter is written very shortly before the end of the
war it illustrates that efforts were still being made to ensure the
blockhouses were well supplied. The end of the struggle was far from
certain even with the peace talks in progress. After all, it had been
assumed that the situation in South Africa would be swiftly settled
in 1899 when such a small state matched itself against the might of
the British Empire. It had, powever, dragged on for three years proving
to be a hard fought contest against a resourceful and elusive foe. It
is possible that Griffin tried to give a better impression than was
the case to reassure his family and friends but this is unlikely. Having
recently arrived he would know all about Joseph's experience in Ladysmith.
Griffin also endorses the army supply system, implying that he had heard
people deride it in the past:
... we can afford to eat 2 tins of jam a day. Whenever
you hear anybodey calling the army about the neglect of the troops you
call them a liar and stand upon me for the proof. Each man is also entitled
to 1 pint of beer a day but the regiment has got to get a canteen train
up first.
Griffin's letter suggests that he is agreeably surprised at the quality
of army logistics at this time. Admittedly a static defence line is
far easier to supply than troops on the march or searching the bushveldt
for commandos, but it is notable that many troops found the food in
the army far better than what they were used to at home. The army was
still a way of escaping poverty in civilian life and recruits were at
least certain of regular food. Griffin
finishes his comments on the supply system by claiming that if he spent
his entire twelve months of service at the same post he expected to
return two or three stones heavier.
In all likelihood Griffin's section of the line had been completely
finished before his arrival and he would not have been required to do
much building other than maintenance. The standard blockhouse was easily
and swiftly constructed, the best recorded time of construction being
three hours. Five men and a corporal
manned Griffin's blockhouse and the time spent on guard duty was relatively
short in comparison to the civilian work Griffin may have been accustomed
to:
The country round here is probably clear of the
enemy, we have to take our turn at guard at night 1 hour on and 4 hours
off so you see we get 8 hours of sleep every night.
During the guerrilla phase of the war Cape Colony was generally free
of enemy activity although there were exceptions. However, the difficulty
in fighting the Boers was in estimating where they would strike next,
the elusiveness of De Wet being an example of how the British were never
sure where the next contact with the enemy might be. Despite Griffin's
assertion, there was no such thing as a clear sector and guard duty
was more than just routine.
Griffin's opinions may well have changed in the following months and
if this was a letter from a soldier who had served longer in a blockhouse
the contents could well have been markedly different. Having only recently
arrived, Griffin would not have experienced the boredom that living
in such an isolated place could induce. Furthermore, with the war near
its end, supplies would doubtless have been superior to previous months
with a decreased amount of guerrilla attacks. However, it is interesting
to read an account illustrating a soldiers cheerful and optimistic nature
and implying that army life for this soldier, for a time at least, was
an easy one.
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful for the assistance of the staff at the Leicestershire
Record Office and their permission to publish extracts from the sources
quoted.
|