|
Victorian Military Society
About Us
VMS Contacts
VMS Contacts
VMS Fair
Join the VMS
Society Shop
Soldiers of the Queen
Current issue
Book Reviews
Contributors' Notes
Advertisement Rates
SOTQ archive
Buy back issues
Special Interest & Study Groups
Sudan group
Anglo-Boer Wars Group
Diehards
Anglo-Boer
War Memorials Project
Military History Articles
Archive
Links Page

Registered Charity No. 1117006
|
Turkish Uniforms of the Crimean Era: Part Two
By C.A. Norman
Reproduced from 'Soldiers of the Queen', issue 85
Figure 1: Infantry Office from a drawing entitled 'Infantry of the
Army of the Danube Arriving in the Lines, 13 April'.
| 
|
This drawing has no colour notes, but a series of notes
and detail sketches titled 'Turkish infantry guarding the street
of the intendance' gives good colour details of almost identical
uniforms: 'Tunic and trousers Prussian Blue, generally 9 gilt
buttons down the front, red tape edging the front opening, bottom
of collar, (rear) pocket flaps, cuffs and trousers, straight-bladed
swords for subaltern officers'.
This figure differs only in carrying a scimitar instead of
a straight-bladed sword and having no piping on the trouser
seams. Collar and cuffs would be dark blue, shoulder 'passants'
gold, boots black, the fez red with a dark blue (less commonly,
black) tassel. The waistbelt depicted appears so commonly in
Vanson's sketches of officers it might almost be considered
a 'standard' model; he described it as of gold lace with a red
centre line and red Morrocco lining. |
The uniform depicted here would appear to be the most common variant
of the 'standardized' officers uniform, judging from the frequency of
its appearance in Vanson's drawings and notes. The only unusual element
is the description of the officers' uniforms as 'Prussian blue'. I noted
only one other occasion where Vanson used this term, also in reference
to an officer's uniform. The term 'Prussian blue' is generally taken
to refer to a very dark shade with a bit of black added to the dye to
retard fading and discolouration, a practice which had become normal
in most western armies by this period. By contrast, most sources would
seem to suggest that the Turkish army continued to use a plain unmixed
indigo dye for their uniforms till quite late in the century (the contemporary
Spanish army, which followed the same practice, referred to the shade
as 'Turkish blue').
Some additional support for this notion is provided by the fact that
Vanson described a number of figures as wearing 'light' or 'lightish
blue' tunics, with 'darker blue' trousers. I take this to mean the tunics
were simply faded, which would be much more likely with a plain indigo
dye than with the mixed shade. I think in using the term 'Prussian blue'
Vanson was trying to indicate the use by a few officers of the darker
mixed shade, either for practical reasons or simpiy to be stylish.
As a note of interest, the officer in the drawing is depicted leading
troops wearing the 'old' uniform, while the description quotes the other
ranks as wearing the 'new' uniform in 'plain blue', with 7 brass buttons
down the front of the tunic, flapped cuffs, no rear pocket flaps, no
trim on the trouser seams, and white crossbelts (the latter apparently
rather unusual with the 'new' uniform). The officer's uniforms in both
cases being virtually identical, despite what their men might be wearing.
Figure 2: Infantryman from a drawing titled 'August 1854, Bivouac
at Balaclava'.
| 
|
This illustrates a more-or-less standard 'old' uniform.
No colour notes are given, but I think it would be safe to assume
a dark blue jacket and trousers, the bottom of the collar, shoulderstraps
and top of the cuffs edged with red tape; the cuffs are dearly
open up the rear seam. While this would seem to have been the
most common pattern, variations in trim occurred, most notably
on the collar, which might be edged on all sides with red tape,
or on the top and front only, sometimes with variations in the
width of the tape. What appears to be a cap pouch is worn on
the right front of the waistbelt, flanked by a second pouch
of unknown function. A small 'squiggley' line is depicted on
the right breast; conceivably a touch-hole needle on a chain
or cord? The lower legs are covered by stockings with native
shoes; unfortunately, Vanson rarely noted stocking colours,
though in one set of notes he quotes them as 'brown'. |
FIGURE 3: Turkish Infantryman of the 1st Division Debarking at Kamiesch,
7 April 1855'
| 
|
Except for the headgear, this seems a more-or-less standard
representation of the 'new' uniform. Again, no colour notes,
but the tunic and trousers would be dark blue, the bottom of
the collar, shoulderstraps, top of the cuffs and cuff flaps
edged with red tape, brass buttons, black belts with brass plate.
The boots are unshaded but appear to be of 'Western' type, presumably
black. A unit number is occasionally depicted on the shoulderstraps,
as here (in red?). Infantry other ranks trousers were generally
worn loose over the boots, seldom with any trim on the outer
seam. The same variations of trim might occur on the tunic collar
as worn on the 'old' uniform, though cuffs tend to be more standardized.
The rear of the other ranks tunic was generally plain, with
2 buttons at the back of the waist, a slit up the centre seam
of the skirts to the waist, rarely with pocket flaps or coloured
trim. |
Unfortunately, General Vanson gives no details of either colour or
purpose for this curious 'stocking cap', which appears in a number of
his drawings. It might be some sort of cold-weather headgear, or, conceivably
some indication of the troops' national origin (personally, I tend to
the former explanation). In this particular drawing the band is detailed
in such a way as to seem to indicate a 'nappy' material, possibly fur
or some sort of plush? More commonly it is depicted as flat and plain,
but shaded darker than the body of the cap.
Figure 4: NCO from a drawing entitled 'Chasseurs of the Army of the
Danube, 12 April, 1855'
| 
|
There has been some question raised among different sources
as to the status and function of Chasseur battalions in the
Turkish army during this period, and even whether they existed
at all. Vanson definitely depicted some figures he designated
as 'Chasseurs', though he sheds no further light on the matter.
The point these 'Chasseurs' seem to have in common is that they
almost invariably wear the 'new' uniform with late-model French
waistbelt equipment, and are armed with what appear to be French
rifled 'carabines' with sabre bayonets. Unfortunately, in no
case does he give any colour description for them, though the
uniforms depicted appear to be of the normal 'new' model. The
very fact that no unusual features or anomalies are noted would
tend to suggest to me that they were, in fact, the normal infantry
uniform. Possibly these 'Chasseur' battalions were simply ordinary
infantry battalions armed with rifled firearms and perhaps given
some rudimentary training in light infantry tactics, rather
than a separate corps? |
The figure depicted here does show some unique features: the piping
or tape down the front opening of his tunic appears to end at the waist,
he wears what appear to be 'Western' -style gaiters under his trousers,
and the curious scalloped edging to his collar (which might conceivably
constitute part of his rank insignia, in addition to the chevron on
his collar). The shading of this figure would seem to indicate the tunic
was somewhat lighter than the trousers, possibly faded?
An officer appearing in the same drawing also shows some unusual features:
his tunic is of the normal officer's cut but without front piping and
with unshaded collar and round cuffs (possibly indicating entirely red,
since the tunic itself is shaded). The trousers are worn loose, over
the boots, with the suggestion of a stripe or piping down the outer
seam. Over all he wears a sort of knee-length cape shaded dark with
an unshaded sawtooth edging all around, a hint of some sort of decoration
around the shoulder area, fastened at the throat with a clasp.
Figure 5: Infantryman from a drawing titled 'Turkish Infantry Embarking
for the Expedition, Varna, 30 August'.
| 
|
This figure appears to wear a normal 'old' model uniform
with the distinctive Turkish gaiters, gartered at the knee.
These were simply a sort of long tube of woollen material, drawn
on over the foot, reaching above the knee, usually without straps
under the instep. On a number of occasions Vanson described
them as being made 'of the same coarse grey woollen material
as the greatcoats'; on other occasions they were described as
black or various shades of brown.
The shaded item depicted just below the waist is a detached
hood similar to the Russian 'bashlyk', an item appearing in
a number of Vanson sketches, though more commonly tied around
the neck 'boyscout' fashion (on one occasion such a hood is
described as black).
The black cartridge pouch has a circular brass plate embossed
with a 5-point star; Vanson indicates this as by far the most
common form of pouch device, though a cut-out star sometimes
appears, or occasionally a more elaborate type of 6-point star
on a disc.
His pack or haversac is a simply-made flapped sack of canvas,
one of a variety of types in use, with a blanket tied around
it. A large iron waterbottle of Russian type is slung at the
rear of the pack (the most common model in use, according to
Vanson). The brass button attaching the fez tassel is dearly
visible in this view. |
Figure 6: Infantry NCO from a drawing entitled Turkish Contingent,
Balaclava Bivouac, August 1854'.
| 
|
I would assume the upper garment depicted is some sort of
short greatcoat, one of a variety of types in use. Since it
is unshaded (unlike the trousers, which are presumably dark
blue) I would assume it to be of a different colour, possibly
some shade of grey, and trimmed with red tape on collar, cuffs
and shoulderstraps.
Native shoes are strapped over the 'foot' part of the gaiters,
which are ungartered. simply drawn up loosely above the knee.
Belts appear to be white, and a roll of some sort (probably
a blanket) is slung across the back. His rank insignia comprises
a chevron on either side of the collar (worn diag- onally, rather
than the more common straight up-and-down placement) and a short
sabre on a bandolier. While there was a system of NCO rank insignia,
worn on the collar, Vanson indicates that NCOs were frequently
to be distinguished only by the fact they carried some type
of short sword (generally of a variety of Western or pseudo-Western
models), and often had more modern firearms than their men.
Unfortunately, Vanson gives no indication whatever of the colour
or material of NCOs' rank insignia: I suspect it may have been
of the same red tape used to trim the tunic, but gold lace or
even embroidery are equally possible. |
|